33/VIII 2026 [161-165]161)
The Soviet space program as seen from Washington, 1964–1968by Andrea Zullo Monday, August 17, 2026
Satellite photo of an N1 rocket on its launch pad at Baikonur. The United States tracked the development of the Soviet lunar program primarily using reconnaissance satellites. (credit: via Harry Stranger)The centrifuge on which Yuri Gagarin trained, before becoming, in April 1961, the first man to fly in space, was not of Soviet manufacture. It had been built in West Germany, installed at a research complex on the outskirts of Moscow, and tested in early March of that year. The detail is not merely a curiosity in itself. It matters above all because Washington knew it. In a report by the CIA’s Office of Scientific Intelligence, dated December 1964,[1] American analysts had already put in writing that part of the equipment the Soviet Union used to prepare its cosmonauts had been purchased in the West: two large West German pressure chambers, for which the report estimated a cost of about twenty-one million marks, a little over five million dollars at the time, and a Swedish centrifuge used to train Valentina Tereshkova, the first woman to fly in space.
https://www.thespacereview.com/article/5287/1162)
Colonizing Antarctica and other anti-space fablesby Milan M. Ćirković Monday, August 17, 2026
The National Science Foundation’s McMurdo Station in Antarctica. (credit: NSF/Elaine Hood)There is a persistent red herring that emerges whenever feasibility and desirability of space colonization is debated: “Why don’t we colonize Antarctica?” Or, perhaps a more sophisticated version: “Why don’t we colonize Antarctica first?” Shouldn’t that be easier? Shouldn’t that be more “natural”?[1]
These are ostensibly reasonable questions that, on some further reflection, turn out to be irrelevant, misguided, and confusing, not to mention often malevolent. There are at least five different reasons why that is so, outlined here roughly in order of decreasing importance.
https://www.thespacereview.com/article/5288/1163)
Two futures on the Moonby Alexander William Salter Monday, August 17, 2026
An illustration of NASA’s concept for a lunar base at the south polar region of the Moon. (credit: NASA)In November 2023, Chinese and Russian defense researchers secretly gathered in Guangzhou to plot the destruction of American commercial satellites.
Documents from those meetings, revealed this July by a joint investigation from The Insider, Der Spiegel, and Le Monde, describe a partnership to build weapons to counter Elon Musk’s Starlink constellation. The goal is to combine Russian battlefield experience with Chinese industrial might to jam, hack, and even physically kill a major satellite network. One Chinese presentation called the constellation’s hundreds of satellites a “space blockade” and proposed cheap “one-against-many” weapons to shoot them down faster than SpaceX could launch replacements.
https://www.thespacereview.com/archive/5280a.jpg164)
Lemons to bitter lemonade: from the Samos E-5 to the LANYARD reconnaissance satellite (part 3)by Dwayne A. Day Monday, August 17, 2026
Launch of a CORONA E-6 reconnaissance satellite in June 1962. The E-6 had a pointed reentry vehicle that carried the exposed film from the two cameras. Five Samos E-6 missions were launched in 1962 and all failed. The E-6 was later developed into the SPARTAN experimental reconnaissance program. (credit: Peter Hunter Collection)The Samos E-5/LANYARD reconnaissance project was not the only effort to get something useful out of the Samos reconnaissance satellite program. When the Samos program was underway, the US Air Force sought to develop both a higher-resolution satellite—the E-5—as well as a satellite that could image large areas of the Earth at lower resolution so that photo interpreters could look for changes and new construction. That program was named the Samos E-6. But the Samos E-6 also suffered development problems and was canceled. Like the E-5, the Samos E-6 was also revived in an effort to adapt the camera system to use proven CORONA technology. That project was known as SPARTAN, named not for the famous Greek warriors, but for frugality (see “Lemons to bitter lemonade: from the Samos E-5 to the LANYARD reconnaissance satellite (part 2),” The Space Review, August 3, 2026, and part 1.)
https://www.thespacereview.com/article/5290/1165)
Wishing for rocketsby Jeff Foust Monday, August 17, 2026
A ULA Vulcan on the pad before its first—and, so far, only—launch of the year in February. (credit: ULA)Last month, Cambridge University researchers published a study hailing a breakthrough in access to orbit. Launch costs, they argued, were cheaper than ever, at $3,868 per kilogram, and projected to fall further: $1,569 per kilogram by 2030 and $273 per kilogram by 2040.
“The cost of space launch technology is now falling faster than during one of history’s greatest transport revolutions,” said the lead author, Alessio Terzi, referring to the rise of steam-powered ships in the 19th century.
One industry executive had a succinct response to that study. “I wish,” said the official, speaking on background. “I don’t think Cambridge professors have been buying many rockets recently.”
If they had, that official and others have said, they would find a highly constrained market where it is difficult to find a ride to orbit—and if you do, you’re likely paying a premium price for it. That is a combination of rockets currently grounded, rockets whose introduction continues to be delayed, and worries about the future of a program that has provided affordable access to space for smallsats.
Wishing for rockets to resume launchesThe lineup of rockets currently grounded is impressive—or would be, if it wasn’t maddening to customers. Blue Origin’s New Glenn, of course, is out of service since an explosion during a static-fire test in May that seriously damaged its Cape Canaveral launch pad. ULA’s Vulcan has not flown since February, when a solid rocket booster on a launch suffered a “significant performance anomaly,” although the rocket was able to successfully complete its mission. India’s PSLV rocket, a workhorse for India’s space program and a popular option for some companies, has suffered back-to-back failures. Last week, Japan’s H3 performed its first operational launch since a failure last December (it did conduct a successful test flight in June of a different variant of the vehicle, which carried only a few smallsats.)
That is significant capacity sidelined, to the detriment of customers ranging from the US Space Force to Amazon, whose Amazon Leo constellation is relying in large part on New Glenn and Vulcan.
https://www.thespacereview.com/article/5291/134/VIII 2026 [166-170]166)
Review: Lunacyby Jeff Foust Monday, August 24, 2026
Lunacy: Ten False Promises of the New Space Ageby Ben Bramble
Princeton Univ. Press, 2026
paperback, 200 pp.
ISBN 978-0-691-28128-5
US$18.95
https://www.amazon.pl/dp/0691281289Space advocates have long offered grandiose visions of how space could solve problems on Earth and provide a better, even utopian, future for humanity. Space settlements would provide new homes for people. A million-person city on Mars offers similar opportunities. Space-based solar power offers plentiful, clean energy. Mining of asteroids and the moon could provide key metals and helium-3 for future fusion reactors. These are all visions, though, that have failed to come true—at least, not yet.
https://www.thespacereview.com/article/5292/1167)
Capability before prestige: A realistic astronomy and space-science strategy for Bangladeshby Shaikh Afnan Birahim Monday, August 24, 2026
Bangladesh is taking steps in space science, such as installing a radio astronomy antenna on a university building. (credit: CASSA)Bangladesh is poorly positioned to host a world-class ground-based optical observatory. Its humid climate, long monsoon season, low elevation, dense population, and growing light pollution create structural disadvantages compared with dry, high-altitude sites in Chile, Hawaii, the Canary Islands, and the Himalayas.
This does not leave Bangladesh without a viable path into astronomy and space science. It means the country must pursue a model suited to its geography, technical capabilities, and national needs. The central policy question is not whether Bangladesh can become another Chile, but where it can build internationally relevant capability on realistic foundations.
https://www.thespacereview.com/article/5293/1168)
At the corner of No and Where: the cold Cold War mystery of Aspidnoye airfieldby Harry Stranger and Dwayne A. Day Monday, August 24, 2026
The Aspidnoye airfield was constructed in the far north of the Soviet Union probably in the early 1960s. It consisted of a very long runway obviously intended to handle large aircraft. But it was not paved, and no support infrastructure was built around the airfield. When it was photographed by American reconnaissance satellites, it presented a mystery. (credit: Harry Stranger)There is an old American joke about a remote location that is not quite in the middle of nowhere, “but you can sure see it from there.” The Soviet Aspidnoye airfield was the middle of nowhere, and for a period in the Cold War it must have been a puzzle for American intelligence analysts who watched it from above scratching their heads about why it existed at all.
https://www.thespacereview.com/article/5294/1169)
The smoldering dead end: a history of solid rocket motors and their economic scaling limitsby Michael Puckett Monday, August 24, 2026
Space Shuttle Endeavour lifts off on STS-49, its first flight, May 7, 1992. The solid rocket boosters, burning at full thrust, cannot be shut down once ignited. (credit: NASA)The solid rocket motor/booster (SRM/SRB) is a propulsive agent that, once initiated, burns to depletion, requiring no external input. That made it the backbone of Cold War deterrence, but it has never made it the foundation of an economical, scalable, high-cadence space launch architecture, and it never will.
Thermodynamic and ballistic constraintsThe performance of any rocket propulsion system is, at its core, a function of two parameters: the specific impulse (Isp) of the propellant combination and the propellant mass fraction of the stage. These are not independent—propellant chemistry governs achievable Isp while structural requirements govern mass fraction—but together they determine, via Tsiolkovsky’s rocket equation, the delta-v a stage can deliver per unit of total initial mass. The rocket equation—Δv = Isp × g₀ × ln(m₀/m_f)—means that every percentage point of Isp or mass fraction advantage compounds multiplicatively across a flight profile. Every architectural decision in launch vehicle design is, ultimately, a negotiation with this equation.
https://www.thespacereview.com/article/5295/1170)
Three wires, three zerosby Florian Gutzwiller Monday, August 24, 2026
Three failed space-tech investments and the warning signs I paid to ignore
Vector Launch raised millions of dollars but failed to attempt an orbital launch before going under. (credit: Vector Launch)A little while ago, I stood on stage at ETH Zurich for a F*ckUp Night. The format is precisely what it sounds like: say what failed without turning the wreckage into a hero’s journey. No redemption arc, no claim that losing the money was secretly a gift. That night was about my whole entrepreneurial career, but here I want to zoom in on one special case: my three failed space tech investments.
https://www.thespacereview.com/article/5296/135/VIII 2026 [171-176]171)
Review: The Soviet Space Program and International Collaboration during Perestroikaby Louis Friedman Monday, August 31, 2026
The Soviet Space Program and International Collaboration during Perestroika, 1985-1991
by Olga Dubrovina
Palgrave Macmillan
hardcover, 424 pp.
ISBN 9783032031563
US$159.99
https://www.amazon.pl/s?k=The+Soviet+Space+Program+and+International+Collaboration+during+PerestroikaI looked forward to reading this book by Olga Dubrovina, an Eastern European historian specializing in international relations now at the University of Milan.[1] The subject is personal for me: My involvement with the Soviet space program during the six years of Perestroika (and its aftermath) were the most interesting and engaging of my life.[2] I witnessed the lapse of communism, the extraordinary spacecraft encounters with Halley’s Comet, and the rebirth of American space exploration after a decade of darkness.
https://www.thespacereview.com/article/5297/1172)
A look inside the small building showed decades-old test equipment linked to General Electric.
Little building, big mysteryby James Behling Monday, August 31, 2026
A look inside the small building showed decades-old test equipment linked to General Electric.Recently, a volunteer at the Cape Canaveral Space Force Museum came into the museum with several mysterious photos showing the inside of a small (11 by 22 feet, 3.35 by 6.7 meters) unknown and apparently long abandoned facility on Cape Canaveral Space Force Station*. The facility’s purpose was unknown to museum staff, prompting a bit of sleuthing based upon limited clues. One of photos was taken through the only window in the facility, revealing instrumentation that obviously dated to the early years of missile launch operations on the Cape.[1]
https://www.thespacereview.com/article/5298/1173)
Learning from a satellite servicing mission’s failureby Jeff Foust Monday, August 31, 2026
An illustration of the Link spacecraft grappling the Swift spacecraft to reboost it. (credit: Katalyst Space)For someone whose company had given up on its bid to save a NASA space telescope, Ghonhee Lee was remarkably upbeat.
On August 19, NASA and Katalyst Space Technologies announced they had jointly agreed to abandon efforts to raise the orbit of NASA’s Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory, a gamma-ray telescope in a decaying orbit. Katalyst launched its Link spacecraft in early July on a mission to attach to Swift and raise its orbit before Swift reentered in the coming months (see “A swift effort to boost the prospects for satellite servicing,” The Space Review, June 29, 2026.)
https://www.thespacereview.com/article/5299/1174)
Space has a billionaire problem, but it also has a billionaire solutionby Kelsie Goddard Monday, August 31, 2026
While some associate space with the flights of billionaires like Jeff Bezos, their efforts have had benefits for others. (credit: Blue Origin)In American pop culture, space has increasingly become synonymous with a “billionaire’s club.” To many Americans, especially college students entering an uncertain economy, the spectacle of billionaires launching rockets feels profoundly detached from everyday life. Still, the conversation requires more nuance than public discourse usually allows. The growing role of wealthy private actors in commercial space may signal a predictable stage of technological development rather than a dystopian one. This is a textbook case of hierarchical diffusion, as described below.
https://www.thespacereview.com/article/5300/1175)
Commercial space is not an endless field of innovation: an assessment of the good, the bad, and the uglyby Charles S. Galbreath Monday, August 31, 2026
Figure 1: A false perception of commercial space as an endless field of capabilities. (credit: author)Demand for space capabilities and effects has outpaced the government’s ability to provide them. At the same time, the commercial space sector has expanded to meet critical needs. Commercial providers can offer capabilities more quickly and with less government risk than traditional acquisition approaches. As a result, commercial capabilities are a cornerstone of Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s Acquisition Transformation Strategy.
https://www.thespacereview.com/article/5301/1176)
Space Battleship Yamato vs. the Starship Enterpriseby Dwayne A. Day Monday, August 31, 2026
Space Battleship Yamato was a Japanese anime television show that premiered in 1974. The premise involved a spaceship based upon the World War II battleship. Like Star Trek, it has had a cultural relevance, but it is much more tied to Japan’s wartime experience, whereas Star Trek has influenced American space, science, and engineering culture. (credit: Office Academy)Japanese society has long struggled with its World War II legacy. Whereas in Germany many people eventually felt shame for their country’s actions during the war, in Japan, many felt more shame for losing the war rather than starting it. Unlike in allied countries, where it was acceptable to feel and express pride in involvement and victory in World War II, Japan has not celebrated its wartime actions, but rather than try to atone for the country’s brutal occupation of China and Korea, Japan has often chose instead to focus on Japanese victims of the war. Japan’s political leadership has sought to portray a pacifist attitude in the 80 years since the war’s end, while angering countries that Japan occupied and brutalized by refusing to acknowledge what happened, such as the Korean “comfort women” who were forced into sexual slavery.
https://www.thespacereview.com/article/5302/1