0 użytkowników i 4 Gości przegląda ten wątek.
I think this paper provides pretty conclusive evidence that the thrust is explained through what I've mentioned above - propellent being generated by incineration of the materials in the cavity which generate micro-newtons (millionths of-a-pound) of thrust. The fact that the thrust is maintained after RF power is removed and correlates to physical temperature is pretty conclusive. The fact that they found visual evidence of oxidation in the cavity as I suggested in the forums indicates at least one of these effects is definitely occurring. "The implementation of all isolation methods (thermal, magnetic, air circulation block) resulted in the cleanest measurement with an expected behavior such that the thrust appeared after turn-on, then steadily increaseed until power turn off. It then remained there and slowly decreased as the EMDrive cooled down. "
Nie działa tak jak zakładał wynalazca, ale działa i to w próżni. Przynajmniej tak to na dziś wygląda.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/flight/a19229/how-a-new-engine-could-revolutionize-air-and-space-travel/?ref=yfpA jaką macie opinię o tym?
Zastanawiam się czy 98% H2O2 nadawałby się na paliwo do tego silnika?
Pojawiła się jakaś teoria wyjaśniająca działanie silnika emdrive: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601299/the-curious-link-between-the-fly-by-anomaly-and-the-impossible-emdrive-thruster/#/set/id/601309/W artykule jest link do publikacji. Ktoś bardziej kompetentny mógłby to ocenić?