Po dzisiejszym starcie FH z satelitą o podobnej masie można porównać te 2 rakiety.
https://www.forum.kosmonauta.net/index.php?topic=6876.msg205520#msg205520Znowu potwierdziło się, że starty nowych rakiet są bardziej ryzykowne.
Jak duży okaże się poziom niezawodności i częstotliwości startów rakiety NG to dopiero niezbyt odległa przyszłość pokaże.
Turnaround time : NG: We have to wait and see how quickly Blue Origin refly the recovered NG first stages. They hope to refly the first one soon, only a few months after recovery.
F9 boosters are often reflown in 30 to 60 days. FH flights are less frequent.
Cost to LEO : NG $ 68 M (est’ for early launches) for up to 45 tonnes, ie. not less than $ 1,500 /kg.
FH (recovering 2 boosters) : $95 M for up to 57 tonnes, not less than $1,600/kg.
FH (all expended) : $160 M for up to 64 tonnes, ie not less than $ 2,500 /kg.
Blue Origin seem to be selling early NG launches below cost to undercut current FH prices. Later launches may cost $110 M or more.
New Glenn can handle wider payloads, having a 9 m wide payload fairing compared to the 5 m of Falcon.
https://www.quora.com/How-does-the-comparison-between-New-Glenn-and-Falcon-Heavy-look-today-Feb-2026-reusability-turnaround-time-and-cost-to-Leo-wise